This requires the character to surrender their human form and become an A.I., allowing them to use the Reapers to police the galaxy. The second option is the Control ending, where Shepard takes control over the Reapers. On one hand, this choice guarantees the Reapers will be eradicated but it will also kill friendly synthetics like the Geth. The first choice allows players to destroy the Reapers while also wiping out all synthetic life in the galaxy. The ending of the game finds Shepard presented with three choices by the Reapers architect Catalyst for activating the Crucible. The Mass Effect 3 ending controversy is still a raw topic to some long-time fans of the saga, but let’s revisit the ending choices the game offered players. Related: Mass Effect 3 Ending ISN’T As Bad As People Remember Disappointment over how Mass Effect 3 brought the story to a close escalated fast, with fans demanding BioWare change it, with the developers later releasing free DLC that expanded and slightly fleshed out the original Mass Effect 3 ending. The Mass Effect trilogy was a hugely ambitious franchise that featured acclaimed storytelling, voice acting, and gameplay design, but the controversy surrounding the Mass Effect 3 ending can’t be ignored. If a major character died in the first Mass Effect, for example, they wouldn’t return in the second title for some players. The Mass Effect trilogy was designed with player choice in mind, allowing gamers to choose the look and gender of Shepard, and have a key decision they made in one game would carry on throughout the series. The series is set far in the future and revolves around a conflict with the Reapers, a synthetic race trying to wipe out all organic life.
The original Mass Effect trilogy was a role-playing action series that put players in control of Commander Shepard, a veteran soldier in an intergalactic war.
Now that the controversy surrounding the game has died down somewhat, let’s explain the various endings to Mass Effect 3.
0 kommentar(er)
